Blog

How Fault Is Determined in Maryland Car Accidents

If you were 99% right and 1% wrong, should you get $0 for your injuries? 

Maryland’s contributory negligence rule can make that outcome possible, which is why insurance adjusters focus less on “Who caused the crash?” and more on “What can we argue you did wrong?

If you’re weighing whether you need a top-rated Maryland car injury lawyer, the safest move is to learn how fault is actually decided, factor by factor, so the evidence tells one clear story.

Factor 1: Which Driver Had the Right-of-Way and What Duty Applied at That Exact Moment

Fault analysis starts with a simple but strict question: 

What did each driver have to do under Maryland law in that situation? 

Right-of-way rules and basic driving duties define what “reasonable care” means in common crash scenarios. When the evidence shows a driver violated a clear duty, liability usually begins to crystallize.

Common examples:

• Following too closely (rear-end and chain-reaction crashes): Maryland law provides that a driver may not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, considering speed, traffic, and roadway conditions.
• Stop-sign intersections: A driver approaching a stop sign must stop at the appropriate point and proceed only when it is safe. This rule becomes the anchor in many “I stopped” vs. “you rolled it” disputes.
• Left turns and U-turns: A driver intending to turn must yield the right-of-way to approaching traffic that is so near as to be an immediate danger, which is why left-turn collisions are frequently charged with fault against the turning driver.

A Maryland car accident lawyer typically builds the first liability argument by selecting the exact duty that fits the crash and then proving, with evidence, that the duty was breached. That “duty + proof” pairing is what insurers and juries respond to.

Factor 2: What the Physical Scene Proves About Where and How the Impact Happened

When stories conflict, decision-makers lean on physics. The roadway often preserves a trail that can be more reliable than either driver’s memory, especially when the crash was sudden. Investigators look closely at where debris collects, because a tight debris field can point to the impact area and undermine claims like “I was already fully in the lane.” They also evaluate skid marks and yaw marks, which can show whether a driver braked or steered before impact, how late the reaction came, and whether the vehicle began to rotate or slide. 

Gouge marks and pavement scrapes can help pinpoint the contact location and the direction of force, while the vehicles’ final resting positions may either support or contradict the claimed collision sequence. This kind of scene proof is most decisive in lane-change and intersection disputes, where both drivers often insist the other “came into my space,” and it’s why an injury lawyer in Maryland will push for early scene photos before vehicles are moved and the evidence disappears.

Factor 3: What the Vehicle Damage Pattern Shows About Angles, Timing, and Lane Position

Damage is not just “how bad it looks.” It is often a map of the collision.

Adjusters, investigators, and (in serious cases) crash analysts evaluate:

• Point of impact on both vehicles: Front-to-rear damage usually supports a following-distance/attention theory; side damage often supports an unsafe lane change or improper turn theory.
• Height and direction of crush: Helpful when vehicles are different sizes or when a side impact is claimed but damage shows a glancing contact instead.
• Scrape lines and transfer marks: Long horizontal scrape lines can suggest lateral movement at the time of contact; paint transfer can confirm which vehicle contacted first.

This factor is why repair timing can matter: once a car is repaired, the cleanest liability proof can disappear. 

Factor 4: Independent Witnesses and How Credibility is Weighed

Witness testimony can be one of the strongest tools for proving liability when the witness is truly independent and has a clear view. In fault disputes, credibility usually comes down to practical issues such as whether the witness is a neutral bystander or a passenger with a built-in connection to one driver, where the witness was standing and whether that vantage point allowed them to see signal colors, lane markings, or turn arrows, and whether the account stays consistent over time and matches the physical scene evidence. 

Strong witnesses also tend to remember concrete facts, like which lane a car was in, which light was green, or who entered the intersection first, instead of broad conclusions like “they were reckless.” Witnesses matter most when there is no video and the vehicle damage could support more than one theory, and that’s why many people searching for the best accident lawyer in Maryland are looking for someone who can secure witness information early, before memories fade and strangers become difficult to locate.

Factor 5: Police Documentation and What It Can (and Cannot) Establish

A police report often becomes the first document both insurers rely on. It may include a diagram, a narrative, identified contributing factors, and sometimes statements from drivers and witnesses.

But police documentation is a factor, not a final verdict, because:

• Officers often arrive after vehicles have moved.
• The report may reflect incomplete injury information.
• Some conclusions are based on competing statements, not measured scene analysis.

A report is still valuable because it timestamps the conditions and captures early accounts. A Maryland car accident lawyer may use it to frame the initial liability presentation, then reinforce it with independent proof—photos, witness accounts, and damage analysis so the case does not live or die on one document.

Factor 6: Driver Statements and “Admissions” Insurers Try to Convert Into Shared Fault

Insurance companies listen closely to how drivers describe a crash. They are trained to look for phrasing they can label as an admission.

Examples that routinely get weaponized:

• “I didn’t see them.”
• “I’m sorry.”
• “Maybe I was going a little fast.”
• “I thought they were going to stop.”

None of these lines automatically proves negligence, but they can be used to build a contributory negligence story. A smart approach is to keep early descriptions factual: lane, direction, signal state, and sequence of movement, without guessing about speed or motives. For MD personal injury attorneys, controlling the narrative is not about spin; it is about preventing speculative language from becoming the insurer’s “proof.”

Factor 7: Video, Dashcams, and Other Digital Proof That Can Settle Liability Fast

More Maryland fault disputes now turn on video rather than arguments, because footage can resolve questions witnesses misremember and drivers dispute. Useful sources include dashcams, doorbell cameras near residential intersections, business surveillance facing the roadway, and traffic or other public cameras when available. 

When video exists, it often answers the right-of-way questions that decide liability, including who entered first, who drifted lanes, who turned across traffic, whether the light was red, and whether braking occurred before impact. That is why many conversations with the best accident lawyers in Maryland start with a simple question: was there a camera anywhere nearby?

Factor 8: The road design and environmental conditions that change what “reasonable” means

Fault is not evaluated in a vacuum. The roadway and conditions affect what a careful driver would do.

Decision-makers consider:

• Visibility limitations (night glare, rain, fog, blind corners)
• Lane design (merge lanes, turn-only lanes, confusing splits)
• Construction zones (temporary markings, narrowed lanes)
• Surface conditions (wet leaves, standing water, winter slick spots)
• Traffic density and speed differentials

Why this matters: a driver can be within the posted speed limit and still be driving too fast for conditions. The environment can also support or undermine claims like “I never saw them” or “they came out of nowhere.” A Maryland personal injury attorney will often document sightlines and signage quickly because small details like a partially obscured sign can explain why one driver’s conduct was unreasonable.

Factor 9: Causation

Even when a driver violated a rule, fault still requires causation. The legal question is: Did that violation actually contribute to the crash, or was it unrelated?

Examples:

• A driver may have been speeding, but if they were hit while stopped at a red light, speed did not cause the impact.
• A driver may have drifted slightly, but if the other driver ran a stop sign into their lane, the drift may be irrelevant.

Causation is where many insurer arguments get slippery. They try to take a minor imperfection and stretch it into “shared fault.” For anyone evaluating accident lawyers in Maryland, this is a meaningful separator: strong representation does not just identify a violation; it proves the violation mattered to the crash sequence.

Factor 10: Contributory Negligence

Maryland’s contributory negligence doctrine is not a “percentage” system. The defense position is often: if the injured driver contributed at all, recovery may be barred. Maryland’s highest court has declined to abolish contributory negligence, reaffirming it as part of Maryland negligence law.

That is why insurers look aggressively for plaintiff-conduct arguments in car accident claims, such as:

• Rolling a stop sign or entering too early
• Slight speeding or speed not suited to conditions
• Inattention (phone allegations, GPS adjustments)
• Lane placement they label “unsafe”

This factor is not theoretical. It is the center of many Maryland liability disputes. If an insurer starts implying you share blame, that is often the moment people seek the best accident lawyer in Maryland, because waiting allows the shared-fault narrative to settle into the claim file.

Best Accident Lawyer in Maryland for Contested Car Accident Claims

If the insurance company is hinting you share blame, speak with The Law Office of Ben Evan now so your evidence is preserved and your fault position stays clear. Contact us today for a free case evaluation and get a direct plan for proving liability under Maryland’s strict contributory negligence rules.